Boss v. Federal Housing Finance Agcy., Sisti v. Federal Housing Finance Agcy., No. 20-2025 (1st Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-2025 CYNTHIA BOSS, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Defendants, Appellants, SANTANDER BANK, N.A., Defendant. No. 20-2026 JUDITH A. SISTI, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY; NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendants, Appellants. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND [Hon. John J. McConnell, Jr., Chief U.S. District Judge] Before Lynch and Kayatta, Circuit Judges, and Woodcock,* District Judge. Michael A.F. Johnson, with whom Dirk C. Phillips, Omomah I. Abebe, and Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP were on brief, for appellant Federal Housing Finance Authority. Samuel C. Bodurtha and Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP on brief, for appellants Federal Housing Finance Authority, Federal National Mortgage Association, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Joseph A. Farside, Jr., Krystle G. Tadesse, and Locke Lord LLP on brief for appellant Nationstar Mortgage LLC. Steven S. Flores, with whom Michael Zabelin and Rhode Island Legal Services, Inc. were on brief, for appellees. Bruce Bennett, Chané Buck, Lawrence D. Rosenberg, C. Kevin Marshall, and Jones Day on brief for amici curiae Institutional Investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Thomas A. Cox on brief for amicus curiae National Consumer Law Center. June 8, 2021 * Of the District of Maine, sitting by designation. LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs in these appeals, consolidated for oral argument, entered into mortgages giving their lenders the right, under Rhode Island law, to nonjudicially foreclose on their mortgages. The appeals concern whether these plaintiffs can bring constitutional due process claims against the Federal Federal National Home (collectively, Mortgage Loan the Association Mortgage "GSEs") ("Fannie Corporation after the Federal Mae") ("Freddie Housing and the Mac") Finance Agency ("FHFA"), acting as the GSEs' conservator, caused the GSEs to exercise their contractual rights to nonjudicially foreclose. For the reasons stated in Montilla v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n, No. 20-1673 (lst Cir. June 8, 2021), Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and FHFA were not acting as the government when they did so. The plaintiffs' claims fail. The decision of the district court is reversed with instructions to enter judgment in favor of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and FHFA. - 3 -
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
