United States v. Pedroza-Orengo, No. 15-1247 (1st Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CasePursuant to a plea agreement, Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. In keeping with the plea agreement, both parties recommended that the district court impose a low-end Guidelines sentence of thirty months. The district court, however, sentenced Defendant to an upwardly variant sixty-month term of imprisonment. Defendant moved for reconsideration. The district court denied the motion. Defendant appealed, arguing that the district court abused its discretion in imposing his sentence. The First Circuit affirmed, holding that Defendant’s upwardly variant sentence was neither procedurally nor substantively unreasonable.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.