Janet P. Alexander, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-appellee, 98 F.3d 1341 (6th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 98 F.3d 1341 (6th Cir. 1996) Oct. 8, 1996

Before: NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, and BATCHELDER.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.


Plaintiff, Janet P. Alexander, appeals from an order of the district court which affirmed the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the decision denying plaintiff the benefits she sought is not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the district court did not err in affirming the decision.

As the reasons why the decision should be affirmed have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a full written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by the magistrate judge in the Report and Recommendation filed on August 28, 1995.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.