Bernard Fidel; Joe Binder, in in Their Capacity As Proposedintervenors, Plaintiffs-appellants,andjohn Glavaris; Patricia Glavaris; Benny L. Tolley, Plaintiffs, v. Herbert J. Young; James A. Thayer; Jay Janis; John R.williamson; Jerome Nussbaum; Michael W. Mooney; Lynnecrawford; Linda K.s. Blount; Robert R. Sprague; Houstoni. Flournoy; Bernice Huter; Melvin P. Spitz; Rafael E.vega; Gibraltar Savings; Gibraltar Savings, F.a. Melvinrifkind, et al.; Kpmg Peat Marwick; Gibson, Dunn &crutcher; Ernst & Whinney; Ernst & Young; William H.dudley; Resolution Trust Corporation, As Receiver Forgibraltar Savings; Melvin Rifkind; Rifkind, Pondel &parson; Kenneth Leventhal; Richard Sprayregen; Jeromenussbaum; Resolution Trust Corporation, Defendants-appellees, 97 F.3d 1459 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 97 F.3d 1459 (9th Cir. 1996) Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1996. Decided Sept. 16, 1996

Before: FLETCHER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,*  Judge, United States Court of International Trade.

ORDER

On June 2, 1995, plaintiffs-Appellants Bernard Fidel and Joel Binder (collectively "Fidel") requested that the district court sign and enter a proposed form of interlocutory order memorializing the court's October 7, 1991 denial of their motion to intervene in Glavris v. Young, No. 90-6185 (C.D. Cal. filed Nov. 16, 1990).d  On June 21, 1995, the district court denied Fidel's request and, therefore, never signed or entered the proposed order. Fidel appeals from that denial.

We dismiss Fidel's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. A district court's denial of a motion to enter final judgment is not appealable. See Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Prods. Co., 191 F.2d 197, 199 (9th Cir. 1951).

 *

Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation

 d

The named plaintiffs in Glavaris, including proposed intervenors Fidel et al., have appealed from final judgment and all orders of dismissal in that action. Glavaris, No. 96-55444 9th Cir. filed Apr. 5, 1996)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.