Lacerta Enterprises, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, D/b/afrontline Systems, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Geac Computers, Inc., a Foreign Corporation; Fasfaxcorporation, a New Hampshire Corporation,defendants-appellees, 97 F.3d 1459 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This appeal from the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to use for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (1), and we affirm.
Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. See Gregorio T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002, 1004-05 (9th Cir. 1995). The record before us shows that the court did not rely on an erroneous legal premise or abuse its discretion in concluding that appellant's showing of probable success on the merits was insufficient to warrant declaratory and injunctive relief. See id. The record before us also shows that the court did not err in concluding that appellant failed to show irreparable harm. See id. Accordingly, the denial of a preliminary injunction is
AFFIRMED.
The panel finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, appellant's motion for oral argument is denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
