United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. $650,285.00 U.S. Currency, Defendant,andalfredo Apodaca Villegas, Aka: Alfredo Alpodaca Villegas,jr., Claimant-appellant, 94 F.3d 654 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 94 F.3d 654 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. *Decided Aug. 22, 1996

Before BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Alfredo Apodaca Villegas appeals the district court's denial of both his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e) motion for the return of $650,285 whose forfeiture in 1989 went uncontested and his motion for reconsideration of that decision. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We do not consider whether the district court properly exercised jurisdiction or applied the rule of United States v. Cretacci, 62 F.3d 307 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 2528 (1996), to deny Villegas relief. Were we to resolve both questions in Villegas' favor, his ultimate argument, that the Double Jeopardy Clause barred the forfeiture, would be foreclosed by the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. Ursery, 116 S. Ct. 2135 (1996).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.