Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.ming Shan Lin, Also Known As Allen Lin, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service; Dean A. Hove,acting District Director, U.s.i.n.s.; Janet Reno,attorney General of the United States Ofamerica, Respondents, 94 F.3d 649 (8th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
- 94 F.3d 649 (8th Cir. 1996)
Submitted July 26, 1996. Decided Aug. 12, 1996
Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner Ming Shan Lin seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming a deportation order issued in the immigration court. The Board denied petitioner's application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision. Accordingly, the decision of the Board is affirmed and the petition for review is dismissed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
