Naum Morgovsky, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Cresswell, Cake & Echeguren, a Corporation; Julia Shermanmacdermott, Individually and As an Employee of Cresswell,cake & Echeguren; Trw, a Corporation; Creditors'collection Service of San Francisco, a Corporation Dbapremium Collection Service; Mark Love, Individually and Aspresident of Premium Collection Service, Defendants-appellees, 92 F.3d 1193 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case

US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 92 F.3d 1193 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted July 29, 1996. *Decided Aug. 5, 1996

Before: HUG, Chief Judge; SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Naum Morgovsky appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his complaint, alleging a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681t ("FCRA"), for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's dismissal of Morgovsky's complaint, Allen v. City of Beverly Hills, 911 F.2d 367, 369 (9th Cir. 1990), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.