Bruce L. Dahmen, As Personal Representative of the Estate Ofdoris Mae Dahmen, Deceased, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of Oregon, Defendant-appellee, 92 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 92 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted July 9, 1996. *Decided Aug. 2, 1996

Before: GOODWIN and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and KING,**  District Judge.

MEMORANDUM*** 

Plaintiff/appellant, Bruce L. Dahmen as Personal Representative of the Estate of Doris Mae Dahmen, deceased, appeals from the Magistrate Judge's decision granting defendant/appellee, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon's ("BCBS") motion for summary judgment. BCBS is the administrator of a health benefits plan governed by ERISA. Both parties consented to have Magistrate Judge Donald C. Ashmankas preside over the action. The court below held that the proper standard of review in evaluating a plan administrator's denial of benefits is abuse of discretion, and that the pre-existing condition exclusion in the policy at issue bars this action.

The panel affirms for the reasons set forth in the thorough opinion prepared by Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas. AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation

 ***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.