Victor Day, Appellant, v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska; Pill Soonsong, Appellees, 83 F.3d 1040 (8th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska; David Plester, Magistrate Judge.
James C. Zalewski, argued, Lincoln, NE, for appellant.
David R. Buntain, argued, Lincoln, NE (John C. Wiltse, on the brief), for appellee.
Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Victor Day appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in Day's civil rights action. Day v. Board of Regents, 911 F. Supp. 1228 (D. Neb. 1995). Day contends the University of Nebraska's decision to pay him less than other professors in his department was age-based and deprived him of an array of constitutional rights. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude Day is not entitled to relief. Because the controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that an opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
