United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Charles Phillip Elliott, William Melhorn, Defendants-appellants, 82 F.3d 989 (11th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - 82 F.3d 989 (11th Cir. 1996) April 24, 1996

Charles M. Harris, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Fort Myers, Florida, for Charles Phillip Elliott.

Helen H. Sundgren, Naples, Florida, for William Melhorn.

Barry Goldman, Anne Schultz, Assistant United States Attorneys, Miami, Florida, for Appellee in No. 90-3696.

Anne R. Schultz, Asst. United States Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Miami, Florida, for Appellee in No. 94-2020.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 89-14-CR-FTM-10), Lee P. Gagliardi, Judge.

Before ANDERSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The opinion published at 62 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 1995) is amended with respect to section IIC1 as follows:

(1) on page 1313, the twelfth line of the first paragraph under section IIC1, located on the right side of the page, "named" is deleted and is replaced with "identified";

(2) on page 1314, the nineteenth line of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, "named" is deleted and is replaced with "identified";

(3) on page 1314, the twentieth line of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, following "indictment" and preceding the period and footnote number, add "because their losses have been proved and are the direct result of Elliott and Melhorn's crimes of conviction";

(4) on page 1314, the twenty-first line of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, following "court's," add "restitution"; and

(5) on page 1314, the twenty-third through the twenty-fourth lines of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, delete "not named in the Amended Indictment" and replace with "whose losses are unsubstantiated and are too attenuated from the crimes of conviction."

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.