Boss Man Einstein, Also Known As Accountability Burns,plaintiff-appellant, v. Tulsa County Election Board, Defendant-appellee, 82 F.3d 425 (10th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 82 F.3d 425 (10th Cir. 1996) April 9, 1996

Before SEYMOUR, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.


Boss Man Einstein appeals from a district court order of September 28, 1995, refusing to consider his Motion for Relief. The district court correctly noted that Appellant's case was dismissed on October 6, 1992, and that this court subsequently affirmed that dismissal. Appellant failed to suggest any grounds, and we can discern no grounds, on which relief could be granted.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

 *

The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to the applicable rules. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.