Michael Steven Milligan, Petitioner-appellant, v. State of Oregon, Respondent-appellee, 82 F.3d 423 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 82 F.3d 423 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted March 26, 1996. *Decided April 1, 1996

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Michael Steven Milligan, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for injunctive relief. Because the district court subsequently dismissed Milligan's action, Milligan's interlocutory appeal is merged with the dismissal of the action. See Securities & Exch. Comm'n v. Mount Vernon Memorial Park, 664 F.2d 1358, 1361 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 (1982). Therefore, the appeal of the denial of his motion for injunctive relief is moot. See Mount Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan, 954 F.2d 1441, 1450 (9th Cir. 1992) (stating that when underlying claims have been decided, the reversal of a denial of preliminary injunction would have no practical consequences, and the issue is therefore moot).

Accordingly, we dismiss Milligan's appeal of the denial of injunctive relief as moot. See Sample v. Johnson, 771 F.2d 1335, 1338 (9th Cir. 1985) (holding that federal courts lack jurisdiction to decide moot issues), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1019 (1986).

DISMISSED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.