Admiral Britt, Petitioner-appellant, v. Pat Keohane; Eddie Geouge, Respondents-appellees, 82 F.3d 422 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Federal prisoner Admiral Britt appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the Bureau of Prison's denial of his administrative appeal from a disciplinary sanction of the loss of 288 days of good time credits. A disciplinary hearing officer found Britt guilty of selling heroin within the prison and threatening to assault another inmate who refused to pay for the heroin. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, Bostic v. Carlson, 884 F.2d 1267, 1269 (9th Cir. 1989), and affirm for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, adopted in full by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, we deny Britt's request for oral argument
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
