Gerald M. Moore and Son, Incorporated, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Joseph S. Drewry, Jr., Defendant-appellant,anddrewry and Associates, Incorporated, Defendant, 81 F.3d 514 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 81 F.3d 514 (4th Cir. 1996) Argued April 3, 1995. Decided April 22, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (CA-93-1118-N)

ARGUED: Brian Nelson Casey, Taylor & Walker, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. John Stephen Wilson, Willcox & Savage, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Walter D. Kelly, Jr., Willcox & Savage, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Reversed by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge MOTZ joined.

OPINION

MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge.


Joseph S. Drewry, Jr. (Drewry) was president of Drewry and Associates, Inc. (D & A), which entered a contract with Gerald M. Moore & Son, Inc. One question presented was whether Drewry, as president of D & A and the engineer who performed the work called for, was liable for the purely economic losses resulting from the negligent performance of the contract.

The question was certified to the Supreme Court of Virginia which held that "in the absence of privity, a person cannot be held liable for economic loss damages caused by his negligent performance of a contract." Hence "the certified question was answered in the negative."

Accordingly, the opinion holding Drewry individually liable under the economic loss doctrine is

REVERSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.