Lee D. Wight, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Franchise Tax Board; Gerald Goldberg; Wells Fargo Bank;cary Curtis; Delta Dental of California; Enolam. Guillory, Defendants-appellees, 81 F.3d 171 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 81 F.3d 171 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted March 26, 1996. *Decided March 29, 1996

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Order filed on June 9, 1995. See Franchise Tax Bd. v. United States Postal Service, 467 U.S. 512 (1984); California v. Grace Brethren Church, 457 U.S. 393 (1982).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.