Ann Cotter, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City & County of San Francisco, Defendant-appellee, 81 F.3d 167 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Ann Cotter appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the City and County of San Francisco in Cotter's action alleging that she was subjected to a hostile work environment because of her gender in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's memorandum and order, filed on December 16, 1994.1
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Cotter's remaining claims for relief are without merit
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
