William Roberson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of Maryland; J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Defendants-appellees, 8 F.3d 820 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-93-1917-JFM)
William Roberson, Appellant Pro Se.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Roberson's civil action seeking damages for economic hardship allegedly resulting from Maryland's compulsory automobile insurance laws. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Roberson v. Maryland, No. CA-93-1917-JFM (D. Md. July 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We note that the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of compulsory automobile insurance laws. See Bell v. Burson, 402 U.S. 535 (1971)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
