Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Fredreka Secrest; David W. Daniel, Clerk, U. S. Districtcourt; Beth Lee, Deputy Clerk, U. S. Districtcourt; Patricia Lassiter, Deputy Clerk,u. S. District Court,defendants-appellees,andj. A. Dobber, Defendant, 8 F.3d 820 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-92-660-H)
Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant noted this appeal in an action under active consideration in the district court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Appellant has identified no appealable order, and none appears in the record. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
