United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Nadir Y. Abdullah, A/k/a Dykie Roberson, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Nadir Y. Abdullah, A/k/a Dykie Roberson, Defendant-appellant, 8 F.3d 820 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR-88-386-JFM, CA-92-2305-JFM)
Nadir Y. Abdullah, Appellant Pro Se.
Gary Patrick Jordan, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Nadir Y. Abdullah appeals from the district court's orders refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) and granting an extension of time to file Abdullah's notice of appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (5). Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Abdullah, Nos. CR-88-386; CA-92-2305-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 1, 1992; Mar. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
