Dana S. Graham, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Joseph William Kaestner; Janie L. Edmonds; Medford W.howard; Joan Williams; Iva R. Purdy; Theodore N.i.tondrowski; Joel G. Clark; James M. Lumpkin; Thomas N.nance; Robert C. Burkholder, Jr.; Christopher Hackman;linwood T. Wells, Jr., Defendants-appellees, 8 F.3d 818 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-575-R)
Dana S. Graham, Appellant Pro Se.
Joseph William Kaestner, Kaestner, Spieth & Gays, Richmond, Virginia; Deborah Shea O'Toole, Cowan & Owen, Richmond, Virginia; Stacy F. Garrett, III, Commonwealth Attorney's Office, Richmond, Virginia; Lee Melchor, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; Robert C. Burkholder, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Dana S. Graham appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Graham v. Kaestner, No. CA-91-575-R (E.D. Va. July 21, 1992; Mar. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
