Harry Patton Caldwell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Jr.; Edward C. Morris; C. Daniel Larsen;r. A. Lipsner; Julian U. Pugh; Lou Ann White; Richardtaylor; William P. Rogers; John B. Taylor; Steve Hollar;susan A. Ponton; Dianna Helmick; Edward J. St. Angelo;robert Ashby; Douglas Chaffins; Peyton W. Hull,defendants-appellees, 8 F.3d 817 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 8 F.3d 817 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: September 27, 1993. Decided: October 22, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge. (CA-90-510-R)

Harry Patton Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Harry Patton Caldwell appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.*  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Caldwell v. Murray, No. CA-90-510-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 28, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (2) (West Supp. 1993)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.