Hipolito Reutotar, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent, 79 F.3d 1167 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 79 F.3d 1167 (Fed. Cir. 1996) March 8, 1996

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Hipolito Reutotar petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) affirming the reconsideration decision of the Office of Personnel Management that he is not entitled to a deferred annuity under the Civil Service Retirement System. We affirm.

We review final decisions of the Board under a standard of review that compels us to affirm the Board unless we determine that the decision of the Board is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law or unsupported by substantial evidence. 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (1994).

In Reutotar's case, the Board concluded that he served in an excepted, indefinite appointment for the complete time of his federal government employment, and that therefore, consistent with our holding in Rosete v. Office of Personnel Management, 48 F.3d 514 (Fed. Cir. 1995), he was never separated from a position covered by the Civil Service Retirement Act. Reutotar consequently is not eligible for a civil service retirement annuity. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 8331(12), 8333(a), 8333(b), 8336, 8338 (1994). Furthermore, the Board found that Reutotar's excepted appointment was not converted to a permanent employment upon his promotion to Roof Maintenanceman and Plumber.

We have carefully reviewed the record before the Board and find no error in the Board's decision, which we must affirm.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.