Nathan Burgess, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Deputy A. Cruz, Defendant-appellee, 78 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore: PREGERSON, CANBY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Nathan Burgess appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his civil rights action alleging that he was subjected to cruel and unusual punishment when San Francisco Deputy Sheriff A. Cruz assigned him to street clean up work detail despite the fact that he suffered from a back injury. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on June 19, 1995. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976); Berry v. Bunnell, 39 F.3d 1056, 1057 (9th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Burgess's request for judicial notice is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
