Larry D. Hines, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Constance Picciano, Defendant-appellee, 76 F.3d 386 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 76 F.3d 386 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Jan. 23, 1996. *Decided Jan. 25, 1996

Before: ALARCON, HALL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Larry D. Hines, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that California Deputy Attorney General Constance L. Picciano violated his civil rights by removing an action he filed in state court to federal district court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the magistrate's findings and recommendations, which the district court adopted in full.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.