Paul Kay Coronel, Plaintiff-appellant, v. State of Hawaii; Janice Nielsen, Law Librarian; George W.sumner, Director, Department of Public Safety Andgeorge Smythe, Administrator, Halawacorrectional Facility,defendants-appellees, 76 F.3d 385 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore: ALARCON, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Paul Kay Coronel, a Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He contends the district court erred when it denied him relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm.
Coronel contends defendants violated: his right to practice the religion of his choice under the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000; his First Amendment right of access to the courts; and his right to be free from retaliation for exercising his constitutional rights. We disagree for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.