Michael G. Brown, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Youth Center at Topeka; State of Kansas, Department Ofsocial and Rehabilitation Services; Donna Whiteman,individually and in Her Capacity As Secretary of Kansasdepartment of Social and Rehabilitation Services; Harold F.allen, Individually and in His Capacity As Superintendent Ofthe Youth Center at Topeka; David Hilderbrand, Individuallyand in His Capacity As Cottage Director at the Youth Centerat Topeka; Larry Schmidt, Individually and in His Capacityas Youth Service Specialist Iii at Youth Center at Topeka;william Von Hemel, Individually and in His Capacity As Youthservice Specialist Ii at Youth Center at Topeka, Defendants-appellees, 74 F.3d 1248 (10th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and HENRY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the Appellant's brief and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
We AFFIRM for the reasons given by the district court.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
