United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Dwight Clark Pratt, Defendant-appellant, 73 F.3d 371 (9th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseBefore: SNEED, TROTT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Dwight Clark Pratt appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to escape from Lane County Adult Corrections Facility. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing sexual offender treatment as a condition of supervised release in light of Pratt's history of sexual abuse, the importance of protecting the public, and his apparent need for treatment. See U.S.S.G. Sec. 5D1.3(b); United States v. Johnson, 998 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1993). Contrary to Pratt's contention, a condition of supervised release need not be related to the offense of conviction. See Johnson, 998 F.2d at 697.
We lack jurisdiction to review the district court's selection of a sentence at the high end of the Guidelines range. See United States v. Pelayo-Bautista, 907 F.2d 99, 101 (9th Cir. 1990).
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.