United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Earl Craft, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Harold Speer, Defendant-appellant, 73 F.3d 371 (9th Cir. 1995)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 73 F.3d 371 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted Dec. 19, 1995. *Decided Dec. 27, 1995

Before: SNEED, TROTT, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

We affirm the district court's order denying appellants' motions to dismiss their indictments based on double jeopardy. See United States v. Cretacci, 62 F.3d 307 (9th Cir. 1995) (administrative forfeiture of unclaimed property does not constitute punishment); United States v. Washington, 69 F.3d 401, 404 (9th Cir. 1995) (Cretacci applies retroactively to direct criminal appeals).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.