Jack Cohen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarlysituated, Plaintiff-appellee,andanthony Maniscalco, Ii, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity As Receiverfor Imperial Savings Association, an Insureddepository Institution, A.k.a. Imperialfederal Savings Association,defendant-appellee.jack Cohen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarlysituated; Mark Rozells, Plaintiffs-appellees,andmichael Lea, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity As Receiverfor Imperial Savings Association, an Insureddepository Institution, A.k.a. Imperialfederal Savings Association,defendant-appellee, 72 F.3d 686 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 72 F.3d 686 (9th Cir. 1996) Filed Jan. 2, 1996

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Appellants Anthony Maniscalco and Michael Lea, members of a class action brought by Jack Cohen and other employees of Imperial Savings Association against the Resolution Trust Corporation, filed a motion to dismiss their appeals, including their pending petitions for rehearing and a suggestion for rehearing en banc. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the appellants' motion is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).

Under Blair v. Shanahan, 38 F.3d 1514, 1521 (9th Cir. 1994), we vacate our opinion, 61 F.3d 725 (9th Cir. 1995), and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with Blair.

APPEAL DISMISSED AND OPINION VACATED. CASE REMANDED TO DISTRICT COURT.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.