United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. E. Lavay Mckinley, Defendant-appellant, 70 F.3d 123 (10th Cir. 1995)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT¹ 

PER CURIAM

This matter is before the court on defendant's appeals from the district court's orders of detention, denying motion for injunctive relief, ruling on motion for order resolving detention issues and motion to grant bail bond, and defendant's motion to supplement the record. Defendant was convicted on charges of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and money laundering. This court vacated the convictions and ordered a new trial. These appeals stem from defendant's detention pending a new trial.

Pretrial detention is governed by 18 U.S.C. 3142(e),(f), and (g). "Appellate review of detention or release orders is plenary as to mixed questions of law and fact and independent, with due deference to the district court's purely factual findings." United States v. Stricklin, 932 F.2d 1353, 1355 (10th Cir. 1991). We find no error in the district court's determination that defendant presents a serious flight risk and, therefore, we affirm the order of detention. We also affirm the district court order denying injunctive relief, as well as the order ruling on motion for order resolving detention issues and motion to grant bail bond. The motion to supplement the record is granted.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.