United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Carl Wyatt, A/k/a Carlos, A/k/a Carlo, Defendant-appellant, 7 F.3d 228 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR-91-119-WN)
Carl Wyatt, Appellant Pro Se.
Jan Paul Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Carl Wyatt appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (2) (West Supp. 1992). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wyatt, No. CR-91-119-WN (D. Md. Dec. 18, 1992). We deny Wyatt's motion for remand. We also deny Wyatt's request for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
