Milton Inciarte, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James H. Dunning, Sheriff; Ara Health Services; John Doe;john Doe, Ii, Defendants-appellees, 7 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-92-1690-AM)
Milton Inciarte, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Inciarte v. Dunning, No. CA-92-1690-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We note that the facts as brought to light in Inciarte's notice of appeal and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration suggest that the district court may need to revisit the statute of limitations issue
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
