Charles W. Curtis, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Archibald M. Aiken, Jr., Circuit Court Judge for Loudouncounty; William T. Burch, Commonwealth Attorneyfor Loudoun County; Frederick W.hoybach, Defendants-appellees, 7 F.3d 222 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Charles W. Curtis, Appellant Pro Se.
Archibald M. Aiken, Jr.; William T. Burch; Frederick W. Hoybach, WHITESTONE, BRENT, YOUNG & MERRILL, for Appellees.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Charles Wesley Curtis appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Curtis v. Aiken, No. CA-93-477-R (W.D. Va. June 22, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED
This decision does not bar Curtis from raising his claim in a habeas corpus action once state remedies are exhausted
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
