Ealum Lee Stearman, Petitioner-appellant, v. Tom R. Kindt; Janet Reno, Respondents-appellees, 67 F.3d 312 (10th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CasePetitioner-appellant Ealum Lee Stearman, an inmate appearing pro se, appeals from the district court's dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. 2241. Mr. Stearman claims that he was denied parole erroneously. We affirm for substantially the reasons set forth by the district court. 1 R. doc. 18. Our disposition of Mr. Stearman's appeal renders moot his petition for change of custody pending court's decision under Fed. R. App. P. 23(b).
AFFIRMED.
The petition for change of custody is DENIED. See also Stearman v. Kindt, unpub. order at 1 (10th Cir. filed Sept. 14, 1995) (denying Mr. Stearman's motion for release pending appeal).
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order. 151 F.R.D. 470 (10th Cir. 1993)
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause therefore is ordered submitted without oral argument
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
