United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Brian Ray Noyes, Defendant-appellant,, 66 F.3d 337 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 66 F.3d 337 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. *Decided Sept. 8, 1995

Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Brian Ray Noyes appeals his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine, carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, and possession of a firearm by a previously convicted felon. Noyes contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress jailhouse comments made by his co-defendant and the testimony of police officers who followed Noyes to the methamphetamine. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291, and we affirm.

A defendant who voluntarily and knowingly pleads guilty waives claims of constitutional violations that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea. See Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 266-67 (1973); United States v. Cortez, 973 F.2d 764, 766 (9th Cir. 1992). There is no evidence in the record that Noyes considered his plea to be conditional, and the record indicates that the district court complied with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and insured that Noyes' guilty plea was voluntary. See United States v. Roberts, 5 F.3d 365, 368 (9th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. Crim. P. 11. Accordingly, the district court is

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.