Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.david C. Hallahan, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent, 62 F.3d 1411 (1st Cir. 1995)
Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
- 62 F.3d 1411 (1st Cir. 1995)
Aug. 8, 1995
David C. Hallahan on brief pro se.
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Timothy Q. Feeley, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for respondent.
D. Mass.
AFFIRMED.
Before SELYA, CYR and BOUDIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully reviewed the record. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in part B of the district court's opinion. Petitioner's allegations were too conclusory to require an evidentiary hearing.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
