United States of America, Respondent-appellee, v. Antonio Garfield Black, Petitioner-appellant, 60 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 1995)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 60 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted June 26, 1995. *Decided July 3, 1995

MEMORANDUM** 

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Black appeals the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Having conducted a de novo review, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. The district court did not err by denying the recusal motion. See United States v. Studley, 783 F.2d 934, 939-40 (9th Cir. 1986) (recusal not required merely because litigant sued the judge).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.