John L. Debbs; Patsy R. Debbs, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. California Workers Compensation Appeals Board; William B.donohoe; Dennis Hannigan; Richard W. Younkin; Jacobmargosian; John S. Oda; John R. Sullivan; Diana Marshall;department of Industrial Relations for the State Ofcalifornia, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement,defendants-appellees, 60 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 60 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted June 26, 1995*Decided July 3, 1995

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

John and Patsy Debbs appeal pro se the district court's denial of their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (4) motion to set aside a judgment as void. In the underlying judgment, the district court dismissed the Debbs' challenge to the constitutionality of California Labor Code Secs. 5307.5, 5408, and 5307, arising when a state court determined that John Debbs was incompetent to represent himself in a workers' compensation claim. For the reasons stated in the district court's order denying the Debbs's motion, the district court is

AFFIRMED.1 

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

 1

Appellants' motion to file a second reply brief is denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.