Don De'fore Watson, Petitioner-appellant, v. Robert G. Borg, Warden, Respondent-appellee, 56 F.3d 75 (9th Cir. 1995)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 56 F.3d 75 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted May 16, 1995. *Decided May 18, 1995

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Don De'Fore Watson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order summarily dismissing in part his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because the district court has not issued a final order disposing of all the claims in Watson's habeas petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Blazak v. Ricketts, 971 F.2d 1408, 1410 (9th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). As the district court noted in its order, Watson's claim regarding the inadmissibility of a preliminary hearing transcript remains under submission.

DISMISSED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.