Charles F. Wood, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America; James A. Ryan, Major General,individually and As the Adjutant General of the Arkansasnational Guard; Charles W. Harris, Major General (ret),individually and As the Commander Arkansas Air Nationalguard; George T. Landers, Colonel, Individually and As Thesupport Personnel Management Officer, Defendants-appellees, 52 F.3d 331 (8th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 52 F.3d 331 (8th Cir. 1995) Submitted: Apr. 12, 1995. Filed: Apr. 18, 1995

Before FAGG, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Charles F. Wood appeals from a final order of the district court1  dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Wood's complaint alleged that the defendants violated agency regulations with the willful intent to deprive him of his liberty and property rights by failing to offer him available employment for which he alleges he was qualified. On appeal, Wood contends that the district court had jurisdiction under the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 (1988), to review his claims. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed Wood's complaint based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction for the reasons set forth in the court's opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

 1

The Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, who presided with the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.