Robert L. Hager, Petitioner-appellant, v. Tom R. Kindt; United States Parole Board; United Statesbureau of Prisons, Respondents-appellees, 51 F.3d 286 (10th Cir. 1995)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT¹ 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties' request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Robert L. Hager, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, appeals from the district court's order adopting the Report and Recommendation of the United States magistrate judge in its entirety and denying Hager's petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241.

On appeal, Hager contends that the district court erred (1) in not conducting an evidentiary hearing or, in the alternative, (2) in not granting him four years of credit on his federal sentence, which he alleges to have been illegally denied him without due process of law. In the district court, Hager asserted that (1) there was no legal basis for the Bureau of Prisons' decision to rescind its August 31, 1983, sentence credit decision in his case, (2) the parole revocation hearing held on May 13, 1992, was not held within the statutorily proscribed time after execution of his parole violation warrant, and (3) the Bureau of Prisons erred in denying him administrative relief.

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's "Report and Recommendation" filed on June 24, 1994, and the Order of the district court filed on October 31, 1994.

AFFIRMED.