United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Michael Anthony Lee, Defendant-appellant, 50 F.3d 17 (9th Cir. 1995)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 50 F.3d 17 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted March 7, 1995. *Decided March 13, 1995

Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Michael Anthony Lee appeals his conviction and 70-month sentence imposed following the entry of his guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lee's counsel submitted a brief stating the he finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.