S. Keith Curran; Rhonda Curran, Appellants, v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.a., Appellee, 471 F.3d 857 (8th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this CaseFiled: December 18, 2006
Robert L. Depper, Jr., Depper Law Firm, Eldorado, AR, Donald Richard Jones, Richard Wilensky, Wilensky & Jones, Patrick J. Mulligan, Eric N. Roberson, Jason H. Fox, Reid Stewart, Law Offices of Patrick J. Mulligan, Dallas, TX, for appellants.
Elizabeth Robben Murray, Kevin Arlen Crass, Friday & Eldredge, Little Rock, AR, Marc D. Sokol, Matthew M. Neumeier, Scott T. Schutte, Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, for appellee.
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs appeal a judgment entered against them by the district court1 in their action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e). They claimed that RESPA prohibits charging fees for providing mortgagees with payoff statements. We rejected an identical claim in Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (2006), and we therefore reject the present claim.
Affirmed.
The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
