United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Raymond Thomas Zompa, Defendant-appellant, 47 F.3d 1178 (10th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseMr. Zompa appeals his conviction for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. 371, in connection with a telemarketing scheme. His attorney filed an Anders brief. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. 1291. After a careful review of the record, we find that sufficient evidence was adduced at trial to support Mr. Zompa's conviction, and that he received effective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Urena, 27 F.3d 1487, 1489 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 455 (1994); Dever v. Kansas State Penitentiary, 36 F.3d 1531, 1536-37 (10th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order. 151 F.R.D. 470 (10th Cir. 1993)
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause therefore is ordered submitted without oral argument
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
