United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Louis Wayne Galligan, Defendant-appellant, 46 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 46 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995. *Decided: Jan. 31, 1995

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Louis Wayne Galligan appeals his sentence imposed following his conviction by guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Galligan contends that his state burglary conviction under Wash. Rev. Code Sec. 9 A. 04.110 did not qualify as a predicate violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act (18 U.S.C. § 924(e)) because his conviction did not meet all the requirements of a "generic burglary" as set forth in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990). Specifically, he contends that section 9 A. 04.110 defines "building" more broadly than Taylor. Because the information to which Galligan pleaded guilty charged him with entering a building with a common street address, his burglary conviction included the element of entering a "building" consistent with Taylor. See United States v. Kilgore, 7 F.3d 854, 855 (9th Cir. 1993). The district court therefore properly determined that Galligan's burglary conviction constituted a predicate violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act. Id.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.