Rebecca Arnold, Appellant, v. Ltv Missiles & Electronics Group, Missile Division, Appellee, 45 F.3d 433 (8th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 45 F.3d 433 (8th Cir. 1994) Submitted: Dec. 6, 1994. Filed: Dec. 29, 1994

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


In this Title VII action, Rebecca Arnold asserts LTV Missiles and Electronics Group (LTV) discharged her during a reduction in LTV's work force because of her sex. At the bench trial, Arnold contended LTV retained a less qualified male employee and laterally transferred another male employee to protect him from the layoff. LTV responded with legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for choosing to terminate Arnold. Examining the case under the framework described in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), the district court concluded Arnold failed to carry her burden of proving that LTV intentionally discriminated against her because of her sex, and entered judgment for LTV. Arnold appeals.

Contrary to Arnold's assertion, the district court correctly analyzed this case under McDonnell Douglas because Arnold did not present sufficient evidence to warrant a mixed-motive analysis. See Sargent v. Paul, 16 F.3d 946, 948-49 (8th Cir. 1994); Radabaugh v. Zip Feed Mills, Inc., 997 F.2d 444, 448-49 (8th Cir. 1994). Having reviewed the record, we conclude the district court's findings that LTV had legitimate reasons for its employment decisions and did not terminate Arnold because of her sex are not clearly erroneous. See Tuttle v. Henry J. Kaiser Co., 921 F.2d 183, 186 (8th Cir. 1990) (standard of review).

We thus affirm the judgment for LTV.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.