Eizonas, Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Dollar Savings, Defendant-appellee, 45 F.3d 430 (6th Cir. 1994)

Before: MILBURN and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges, and JOINER, District Judge.^* 

ORDER

On December 3, 1993, this court affirmed the district court's order granting summary judgment in this Sherman Act and RICO action. We remanded to the district court the order denying the defendants' motion for sanctions, noting that since the marginal order provided no basis for the denial, it was difficult to review the order on appeal. The district court has now entered a memorandum and order setting forth its reasons for denying defendants' motion for sanctions.

We reviewed the denial of a motion for sanctions for abuse of discretion. On review of the memorandum and order of the district court we cannot conclude that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to award sanctions.

The order denying sanctions is affirmed.