James E. Finney, Plaintiff Appellant, v. John B. Metzger, Iii, et Als., Defendant Appellee.charles Vester Delp, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. John B. Metzger, Iii, et Als., Defendant Appellee.russell Shamburg, Plaintiff Appellant, v. John B. Metzger, Iii, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board;charlie Edwards, Virginia Parole Boardinterviewer, Defendants Appellees, 45 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 45 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted: November 17, 1994Decided: December 22, 1994

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-833, CA-94-835, CA-94-841-R)

James E. Finney, Charles Vester Delp, Jr., Russell Shamburg, Appellants Pro Se.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellants appeal from the district court's orders dismissing without prejudice their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Finney v. Metzger, No. CA-94-833 (W.D. Va. Oct. 12, 1994); Delp v. Metzger, No. CA-94-835 (W.D. Va. Oct. 12, 1994); Shamburg v. Metzger, No. CA-94-841-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.