United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Gonzalez, Inc. Dba Golden State Transportation, Defendant-appellee, 437 F.3d 854 (9th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 437 F.3d 854 (9th Cir. 2006) Argued and Submitted December 7, 2004
Filed June 22, 2005
Amended February 10, 2006

Bruce M. Ferg, (argued); Paul K. Charlton and Christina M. Cabanillas (on the briefs), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for the plaintiff-appellant.

William Kirchner (argued) and Walter Nash (on the briefs), Nash & Kirchner, P.C., Tucson, AZ; Jefferson Keenan (on the briefs) and Michael Piccarreta (argued), Piccarreta & Davis, P.C., Tucson, AZ, for the defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-01-01696-RCC.

Before D.W. NELSON, ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The Appellant's petition for panel rehearing is granted in part and the opinion filed on June 22, 2005, slip opinion at 7425 and published at 412 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2005), is amended as follows:

Page 7448 of the slip opinion, line 12: Replace "In such an office, individuals who own and manage the business operation have a reasonable expectation of privacy over the on-site business conversations between their agents." with "In such an office, individuals who own and manage the business operation have a reasonable expectation of privacy over conversations taking place on the office's telephone lines."

Page 7448 of the slip opinion, line 23: Replace "they had a reasonable expectation of privacy over calls made on the premises." with "they had a reasonable expectation of privacy over calls made from, to, and within the premises."

With these amendments, the petition for panel rehearing is otherwise denied. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.